Home » Blog » Party Wall Surveying » Party Wall Surveyors Must Remain Impartial

Party Wall Surveyors Must Remain Impartial

Share

We have a short 60 second video on this case!

Welter v McKeeve 2018, provides all-important commentary on the conduct of a Party Wall Surveyor and their need to act impartially.

The case saw a building owner undertaking a basement conversion and making use of the adjoining owner’s basement wall that had been built prior.

Dispute arose on the quantum of the making use payable by the building owner to the adjoining owner, and in due course the matter was referred to the third surveyor, who determined the dispute by way of a Party Wall Award.

This Award was appealed, and in providing his judgement, the judge specifically confirmed that party wall surveyors must act impartially and professionally. Furthermore, they are not an agent of, or a mouthpiece, for the owner who appointed them.

This is one of the few occasions where the courts have provided clarity on the much debated and often disputed question as to whether Party Wall Surveyors need to act in an impartial manner. 

The answer is an astounding, yes! 

No Dispute, No Award

No Dispute, No Award

We also have a short informative video on this case! Evans v Paterson 2021, provides all important key commentary on how party wall surveyors have to handle disputes and communication, with their appointing owners. The case arose when an adjoining owner suffered...

read more
No Party Wall Notice, No Party Wall Act

No Party Wall Notice, No Party Wall Act

We have a short informative video on this post here! Power & Kyson v Shah 2023 provides a definitive position on when the Party Wall etc Act 1996 applies.  To provide background on this case, the building owner failed to serve a Party Wall Notice upon the...

read more
Agreed Surveyor Refusal

Agreed Surveyor Refusal

We also have a short informative video on this case. The case of Amir-Siddique v Kowaliw 2018, provides all important commentary on an adjoining owner's surveyor appointment. To provide background on this case, the building owner accused the adjoining owner of acting...

read more